Residents Navigating Moral Distress After the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision
This article published in O&G Open identifies and evaluates strategies used by residents navigating moral distress following the Dobbs decision.
This article published in O&G Open identifies and evaluates strategies used by residents navigating moral distress following the Dobbs decision.
This article published in the Journal of Graduate Medical Education examines the moral injury experienced by OBGYN-residents following Dobbs.
This Contraception study examines abortion training availability and variations in U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in the post-Dobbs landscape.
This JAMA research article explores obstetrician-gynecologists’ perceptions of the impacts of abortion bans enacted after the Dobbs decision.
This white paper analyzes the Texas OB/GYN physician workforce, examining the effects of abortion restrictions on provider availability, training, and healthcare delivery in the state.
Review this resource for an analysis of trends and patterns in residency applications post-Dobbs.
This study in JAMA Internal Medicine analyzes how the Dobbs decision has influenced the distribution and practice locations of obstetrician-gynecologists across U.S. states with varying abortion restrictions.
This JAMA article evaluates the practice patterns and geographic locations of obstetrician-gynecologists following the Dobbs ruling.
Review this article for an in-depth analysis of the impact of state abortion restrictions on healthcare access and outcomes, highlighting changes to the physician workforce post-Dobbs.
This JAMA article discusses the legal challenges and ethical dilemmas that clinicians face in providing reproductive care after the Dobbs decision, including risk of legal penalties, concerns with privacy, and approaches to miscarriage management.