Rodriguez et al.'s article published in JAMA examines whether state-level bans on abortion were associated with changes in the management of spontaneous abortions post-Dobbs.
Review Ali et al.'s recent research published in JAMA that found Texas mothers experienced worse mental health following the state's 2021 abortion ban compared to mothers living in states without bans.
Sabbath et al.'s research article published in JAMA explores obstetrician-gynecologists’ perceptions of the impacts of abortion bans enacted after the Dobbs decision.
This JAMA article from Hammoud et al. tracks trends in obstetrics and gynecology residency applications following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs.
In Aiken et al.'s article published in JAMA, the authors examine the association between state laws banning or restricting abortion post-Dobbs and medications for self-managed abortion.
This study by Zhu et al. published in JAMA Internal Medicine analyzes how the Dobbs decision has influenced the distribution and practice locations of obstetrician-gynecologists across U.S. states with varying abortion restrictions.
This JAMA article by Staiger et al. evaluates the practice patterns and geographic locations of obstetrician-gynecologists following the Dobbs ruling.
This JAMA article published by Reingold et al. discusses the legal challenges and ethical dilemmas that clinicians face in providing reproductive care after the Dobbs decision, including risk of legal penalties, concerns with privacy, and approaches to miscarriage management.
This JAMA article from Chary et al. reviews the legal liability and risks related to abortion miscoding for physicians and hospital systems post-Dobbs.